Home / Resources

SAJC resources

Instant and Delayed Gratification: Thinking About Everyday Choices

Sri Amogha Junior College · Updated 31 October 2026

Instant gratification Versus Delayed Gratification

Instant gratification plays a key role in everyone’s Life and Career and acts as a motivator of human behavior. It engrosses emotions, happiness, desires and a goal too. It stems from the accomplishment of social needs that might be socializing, social approval or mutual recognition.

Motivation is needed for a layman and even for a superman. Nobody is successful without motivation. There are many different factors which motivate people constantly. The outcome of true motivation is gratification. Gratification can be of either concrete or abstract, it is either a reward or a word of appreciation. Gratification happens internally or it comes from an external source, but a person needs to understand that gratification motivates much of what we do.

People make different choices depending on the situation, available support and the value of the reward. A preference in one moment does not define a person’s character.

What does Science Say?

Early studies linked delay of gratification with later outcomes, but later research found that family background and other factors explain part of the association. The task does not prove that waiting for a treat causes academic success.

The psychologists claim that improving delayed gratification leads to self – control and decision – making skills. But it is not easy for everyone to improve the ability to delayed gratification, but having a realistic deadline will certainly help people out. For example, if a man sets a goal of shedding off 10 pounds in a week, he might give up as the goal might be unrealistic. A more realistic goal can be put down one pound per week will let him see good results of his efforts.

Practising realistic goals can be useful, but delayed gratification is not a guarantee of better mental health, success or academic performance. Immediate needs and the person’s circumstances also matter.

Research context: Watts, Duncan and Quan’s 2018 conceptual replication discusses the limits of the relationship between the early delay task and later outcomes.